Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny KEMP results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 2,693 hits . Analysis detected 14,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,884 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,959 of 6,628 authors). This Danny KEMP is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Danny KEMP
Author details
Total words: 11,884
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.7% 22.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst