Topic summary
76% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Presidential Election results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 4,730 hits . Analysis detected 44,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,253 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,556 of 15,852 topics). This Us Presidential Election is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Us Presidential Election
Topic details
Total words: 37,253
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score11 analyzed articles37.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst