Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Wilner results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 3,481 hits . Analysis detected 29,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,004 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,328 of 6,244 authors). This Michael Wilner is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Michael Wilner
Author details
Total words: 25,004
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles25K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst