Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos5,563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Wilner results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 3,481 hits. Analysis detected 29,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,004 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,328 of 6,244 authors). This Michael Wilner is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Michael Wilner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Michael Wilner (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 25,004
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles25K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.9%13.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate