Author summary
⁠94%4 analyzed articles/videos3,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Ceballos results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,226 hits. Analysis detected 18,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,623 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (2,496 of 6,263 authors). This Ana Ceballos is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Ana Ceballos
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠61%Ana Ceballos (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,623
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.3%16.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.0%16.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos