Author summary
91% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justine McDaniel results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,841 hits . Analysis detected 16,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,689 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,449 of 6,365 authors). This Justine McDaniel is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Justine McDaniel
Author details
Total words: 14,689
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst