Hillary Clinton: Biden damaged his legacy and the country by running for reelection in 2024 84%

By OAN Staff Brooke Mallory0%

6/16/2026, 10:55:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 495 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,644 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the article peer group.

Hillary Clinton delivered a blunt assessment of the 2024 presidential election, calling former President Joe Biden’s decision to seek a second term a "terrible mistake" that ultimately cost Democrats the White House. 
Speaking alongside New Yorker editor-in-chief David Remnick at an event at the 92nd Street Y in Manhattan, the failed 2016 Democrat presidential nominee argued that Biden’s choice to run again severely damaged his personal legacy and placed the country in a dangerous position, effectively clearing a path for now-President Donald Trump's return to power. 
Clinton’s remarks come on the heels of mounting post-election friction within the Democrat Party following a National Committee autopsy report that specifically omitted criticism of Biden's late-stage campaign exit. 
Clinton emphasized that Biden’s decision directly contradicted his initial 2020 campaign presentation as a transitional figure meant to act as a "bridge" to the next generation of leadership. 
She asserted that had the president abided by that expectation and announced in the late summer of 2023 that he would step aside, an open and competitive primary contest would have naturally revitalized the party. 
She claimed further that the resulting momentum would have insulated the Democrats from the critical liabilities that later plagued the ticket, arguing that virtually any mainstream alternative  whether then-Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democrat governor, or a Democrat senator  would have defeated Trump. 
Reflecting on the 2024 campaign cycle, Clinton complained that Biden’s refusal to step aside earlier trapped the Democrat Party in a "terrible dilemma." 
While Biden did eventually end his reelection bid in July 2024 following an embarrassing debate performance, the late hour left the party with no time to hold a traditional, Democratic primary process before Harris took over the nomination. 
This made the so-called "pro-Democracy" party look like absolute hypocrites, Clinton appeared to suggest. 
“He made a terrible mistake. 
He made a terrible mistake for himself, his legacy, and for the country. 
He had said that he would not run again, and you know, counterfactual narratives are always a bit tricky, but I believe if he had kept to that plan and said in, say, the late summer of ‘23 that he wasn’t going to run, that he was going to pass, you know, the torch to the next generation, we would have had a real contest,” Clinton told The New Yorker’s David Remnick. 
“And, very sadly, I believe whoever emerged from that contest, whether it was the vice president or a governor or a senator or anybody else, would have beaten Donald Trump. 
So, I think it was a terrible miscalculation on the part of President Biden,” she added. 
“Was it grace, or was it recklessness? 
In retrospect, I think it was recklessness ... 
The stakes were simply too high. 
This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. 
It should have been more than a personal decision.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.3%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias23.6%This article: 5.7%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 40.4%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias40.4%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias15.2%This article: 20.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 17.7%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect20.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 30.7%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 4.7%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias30.7%This article: 2.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 36.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 13.6%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias36.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.8%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 5.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 2.9%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma15.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization15.2%This article: 5.9%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring5.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 8.7%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion17.8%This article: 5.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question5.1%This article: 34.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.4%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)34.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.1%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection7.1%This article: 17.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 11.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice17.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 6.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

495 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker69%attributed speech153writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Hillary Clinton • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 28 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 35 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 45 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 5 words • 100.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 72 words • 100.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 30 words • 100.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 7 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 6 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hillary Clinton

100%flagged-word coverage
342 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+25.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hillary Clinton: 25.4%25.4%Quote-first Misdirection+10.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hillary Clinton: 10.2%10.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.