Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Terrible Mistake results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 3,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Terrible Mistake is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Terrible Mistake
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Terrible Mistake (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 31.3%31.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 26.0%26.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 31.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos