Keyword summary
73%17 analyzed articles/videos9,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Election results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 9,460 hits. Analysis detected 65,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,621 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,526 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Election is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Election

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score17 analyzed articles49.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

JD Vance Allies Fear ‘Coordinated’ Effort Within GOP to ‘Poison’ His Political Future88%
Mediaite70%By Zachary Leeman75%7/24/2026, 12:55:51 PM
The Michigan Democratic Primary Has Grown Absolutely Toxic83%
The Bulwark72%By Lauren Egan52%7/20/2026, 12:13:16 AM
Paris’ Grand Mosque celebrates its 100th anniversary and interfaith dialogue47%
WTOP32%By WTOP Staff29%7/18/2026, 12:58:55 PM
Trump accuses China of 2020 election interference, contradicting U.S. intel44%
Reuters39%By Nandita Bose92% Joseph Ax0%7/17/2026, 3:46:36 AM
Jay Clayton Denies Objective Reality at Trainwreck Hearing89%
Common Dreams96%By Newswire Editor94%7/15/2026, 6:48:44 PM
A French Rebirth?63%
The American Conservative86%By Luke Nicastro65%7/15/2026, 4:03:00 AM
‘Just Stunning’: CNN’s Erin Burnett Counts the Times Trump’s Talked ‘Rigged’ Elections In Just a Month77%
Mediaite70%By Zachary Leeman75%7/15/2026, 12:57:38 AM
Pritzker for president? Handicapping the Illinois governor’s political future18%
WBEZ Chicago9%By Tina Sfondeles28%7/13/2026, 10:05:00 AM
Kamala Harris’s record on Gaza could kill her 2028 hopes78%
UnHerd69%By Emily Jashinsky0%7/3/2026, 5:00:33 PM
Report: Kamala Harris Courts Mamdani, Pro-Palestinian Activists Ahead of Possible 2028 Run38%
Breitbart81%By Jasmyn Jordan69%7/1/2026, 3:15:26 PM