Keyword summary
73% 17 analyzed articles/videos 9,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Election results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 9,460 hits . Analysis detected 65,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,621 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,526 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Election is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Presidential Election
Keyword details
Total words: 49,621
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score17 analyzed articles49.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst