Speaker summary
⁠79%3 analyzed articles/videos480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hillary Clinton results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,818.313 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (24,050 of 28,364 speakers). This Hillary Clinton is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Hillary Clinton
Speaker details
Total words: 480
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
11.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos480 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 33.7%33.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.2%18.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos