Author summary
ā 0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shireen Akram-Boshar results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 3,419 hits . Analysis detected 24,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,684 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (1,828 of 6,197 authors). This Shireen Akram-Boshar is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Shireen Akram-Boshar
Author details
Total words: 15,684
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.5% percentile 3.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.8% 17.8% Politically Left Leaning ā¦ Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.8% 21.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst