Topic summary
76% 12 analyzed articles/videos 17,645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Conflict results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 11,033 hits . Analysis detected 54,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,730 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,476 of 15,398 topics). This US Iran Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. US Iran Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 56,730
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles56.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst