Topic summary
79%31 analyzed articles/videos20,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transgender Rights results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 13,340 hits. Analysis detected 126,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 102,369 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,009 of 16,562 topics). This Transgender Rights is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score31 analyzed articles102.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

"Plaintiff Argues That, If She Does Not Use Her Chosen Name, She Will Suffer Serious and Lasting Effects to Her Mental Health"52%
Reason.com41%By Eugene Volokh7%7/24/2026, 12:32:00 PM
Civil servants are defying the Supreme Court trans ruling91%
spiked93%By Joanna Williams83%7/23/2026, 2:52:58 PM
House rejects one anti-trans amendment, passes two others22%
Salon.com76%By Tatyana Tandanpolie53%7/22/2026, 7:55:10 PM
The Heritage Foundation Only Wanted to Protect Women’s Sports When It Was About Trans Athletes70%
Mother Jones51%By Madison Pauly0%7/22/2026, 10:00:00 AM
The Supreme Court didn’t ban trans athletes. It handed CT a choice75%
CT Mirror20%By Taylor Edelmann0%7/17/2026, 4:01:00 AM
Brett Kavanaugh’s Anti-Trans Ruling Takes a New and Disturbing Turn69%
Slate Magazine69%By Craig Konnoth0%7/7/2026, 7:35:13 PM
Supreme Court protects women’s sports — but not before this young girl paid the price81%
Blaze Media79%By BlazeTV Staff87%7/6/2026, 11:00:00 PM
California Sees Historic Crime Rate Drops in Every Category, Except This One68%
KQED61%By Katie DeBenedetti69%7/6/2026, 10:33:53 PM
The Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Trans Rights34%
Washington Monthly52%By Alison Gash0%7/3/2026, 9:00:00 AM
Advocates Warn SCOTUS' Trans Sports Ruling Could Have Disturbing Consequences71%
HuffPost0%By Levi Kalish0%6/30/2026, 10:40:08 PM