Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Levi Kalish results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 505 hits . Analysis detected 2,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ā 84% (1,079 of 6,611 authors). This Levi Kalish is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Levi Kalish
Author details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.1% 22.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.5% 4.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Slippery Slope: Author 13.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% No True Scotsman: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst