Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Craig Konnoth results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 4,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,309 of 6,350 authors). This Craig Konnoth is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Craig Konnoth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠80%Craig Konnoth (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,176
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.5%23.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.1%16.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 11.9%11.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Author 11.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos