Topic summary
29% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Regulation results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,328 hits . Analysis detected 17,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,831 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,705 of 16,562 topics). This Technology Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Technology Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 18,831
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst