Author summary
76%4 analyzed articles/videos181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wesley Liu results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,005 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (971 of 6,170 authors). This Wesley Liu is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Wesley Liu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
85%Wesley Liu (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,005
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 17.7%17.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.4%8.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 17.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos