BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 1,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 753 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,280 of 21,097 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  President Donald Trump on Thursday had governors and electricity companies join a voluntary pledge to shield U.S. consumers from higher utility bills from data centers  a sign of how the artificial intelligence build-out has become a lightning rod of controversy before the midterm elections. 
The president first announced the pledge with leading AI and tech companies in March, but that initial commitment has done little to comfort voters who are already grappling with affordability issues as they worry about competing for electricity, water and land with tech companies controlled by billionaires. 
It’s unclear, with electricity demand already growing, whether consumers would see genuine savings. 
Trump is doubling down on the pledge at a time when the broader social contract is being rewritten by AI, a technology that is evolving so quickly in its capabilities that governments are struggling over how to provide oversight. 
“You have to convince your community,” Trump said. 
“You can’t fight it. 
You have to go with it.” 
The president added: “If you don’t take all that money, somebody else is going to take it. 
You might as well do it yourselves.” 
The White House said Thursday the pledge has been signed by 23 governors and at least 187 companies, including 55 utilities and 27 data center developers. 
Signers include some of the nation’s biggest utilities such as NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, American Electric Power, Southern Co. and Pacific Gas & Electric. 
Data center developers that have signed the pledge include Equinix, Digital Realty and Prologis. 
The slowdown in data center construction could derail what has been one of the dominant drivers of U.S. economic growth, in addition to possibly ceding the U.S. edge in cultivating the technology to China and create national security risks. 
But AI’s increasing ability to perform basic tasks  such as driving, analyzing spreadsheets and writing software  also threatens millions of jobs. 
That has created mounting public resistance as tech companies concentrate historic levels of wealth in the hands of a select group of tycoons. 
The opposition has spread into the Republican stronghold of rural Texas and led to frustration with Gov. 
Greg Abbott, who is now among the 23 Republican governors who signed Trump’s nonbinding pledge. 
Gina Hinojosa, the Democratic nominee for Texas governor, has been using the issue to challenge Abbott before the November election. 
“They are owned by the richest men in the world,” she said of data centers. 
“We’re all footing the bill. 
There are no rules. 
It is the Wild West of data centers.” 
The increased electricity demand could cause monthly utility bills to rise by 15% to 40% by 2030, according to a recent analysis by ICF, a consulting and technology services company. 
Opposition to data centers has spiraled into a bipartisan issue. 
Voters are worried about the environmental impact, use of AI in schools and the prospect of data centers making their communities more expensive and less livable. 
Data center companies say their facilities help to generate tax revenues for school districts and reduce property tax burdens for homeowners. 
In an interview with The Associated Press last month, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whose computer chips are enabling the AI revolution, said America’s weakness is a lack of power generation for further developing the technology. 
Google, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, xAI, OpenAI and Amazon are among the companies that have already committed to the Trump administration’s “Ratepayer Protection Pledge” that consumers will not shoulder the cost of the data center build-out. 
Despite the pledge, there are challenges on addressing issues with electricity prices. 
The White House has complained that PJM Interconnection, which oversees electric power in 13 states from Virginia to Illinois, can’t ensure adequate electricity supplies at reasonable prices in the AI-driven boom. 
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said Thursday that PJM —- the nation’s largest grid operator  has failed to implement a bipartisan statement of principles signed by the Trump administration and all 13 governors in the region. 
“The Trump administration strongly advises PJM and its member companies to proactively reform its stakeholder process, reform its board governance, and implement the Statement of Principles before it is too late,” Rogers said. 
There are efforts to formalize Trump’s pledge as law, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee approving a bipartisan bill. 
The bill would require data centers to bear the costs of grid upgrades. 
Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 1.9%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Josh Boak: 2.1%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic13.7%This article: 6.5%Josh Boak: 0.5%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic6.5%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Josh Boak: 2.8%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 6.4%Josh Boak: 6.4%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 2.9%Josh Boak: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 0.9%Josh Boak: 0.9%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 3.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Josh Boak: 3.0%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias12.5%This article: 25.5%Josh Boak: 12.7%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias25.5%This article: 2.8%Josh Boak: 1.7%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 1.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Josh Boak: 1.2%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Josh Boak: 1.1%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Josh Boak: 1.3%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.3%Josh Boak: 3.2%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority15.3%This article: 3.2%Josh Boak: 0.8%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.4%Josh Boak: 2.6%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization13.4%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Josh Boak: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 3.7%Josh Boak: 3.5%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion3.7%This article: 0.5%Josh Boak: 0.6%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.5%This article: 9.3%Josh Boak: 4.3%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.3%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.6%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 1.0%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Josh Boak: 1.4%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.2%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.5%Josh Boak: 1.3%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.5%This article: 0.5%Josh Boak: 0.6%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.5%This article: 25.8%Josh Boak: 4.7%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice25.8%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 5.7%Josh Boak: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Boak: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Josh Boak: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.3%

753 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers31%attributed speech517writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 4 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 17 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageGina Hinojosa • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGina Hinojosa • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGina Hinojosa • 4 words • 100.0% coverageGina Hinojosa • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageNvidia CEO Jensen Huang • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Rogers • 37 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Rogers • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gina Hinojosa

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words14% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.5 ptsWriter: 37.5%Gina Hinojosa: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+12.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gina Hinojosa: 12.5%12.5%Politically Left Leaning B-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Gina Hinojosa: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.