Topic summary
58% 91 analyzed articles/videos 69,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Centers results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 29,166 hits . Analysis detected 290,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 335,742 analyzed words across 91 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (13,876 of 15,400 topics). This Data Centers is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Data Centers
Topic details
Total words: 335,742
Article count: 91
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score91 analyzed articles335.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst