Author summary
69%8 analyzed articles/videos1,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Kotzer results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 2,676 hits. Analysis detected 15,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,744 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,201 of 6,628 authors). This Zack Kotzer is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Zack Kotzer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
52%Zack Kotzer (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,744
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.0%21.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate