Kotaku⁠73%

Brazilian Courts Force Xbox To Restore Hacked Account ⁠24%

By Zack Kotzer⁠69%

7/12/2026, 11:47:30 AM

Keywords: Lawsuit, Xbox

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 551 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (16,815 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the article peer group.

Published July 12, 2026 
Xbox, the gaming giant in the midst of a firing frenzy and whose CEO was just appointed to the Federal Reserve , has been humbled by one of their own players. 
As reported by Tom’s Hardware , when a Brazilian player attempted to restore their compromised account, a curt customer service response prompted them to take the complaint to court instead. 
Despite sending a full legal squad to dispute one gamer, Microsoft lost the case. 
Back in April, user Ordo_Liberal posted on Reddit that despite having two factor authentication set up, Microsoft reported that their account had been compromised and its security information altered. 
Microsoft’s customer service claimed the account was unrecoverable, suggesting they simply re-purchase every game. 
Unsatisfied with that answer, they sought out PROCON, Brazil’s comprehensive consumer protections agency. 
In short time, it appears Ordo_Liberal won their court case. 
Using all the corresponding emails and support tickets, the courts decided they were obviously the original owner of the account and that Microsoft knew this, despite providing the useful information to kick rocks. 
Microsoft has been given 15 days to restore the account and pay $2000 real (approx $400 USD) in damages. 
It’s important to note that this case isn’t expected to create much of a precedent. 
Brazil takes these protections seriously , and PROCON makes it very accessible to pursue small-claims damages, not even requiring court costs or securing a lawyer. 
Stateside, the legal system overwhelmingly seems to side with corporate business interests, making the odds of this verdict being recreated a little iffy. 
Despite these seemingly small stakes, Microsoft still sent 12 lawyers to defend them. 
The company has not yet responded to the trial, making more time to address conspiracy theorists on Twitter . 
Since the early days, if Xbox detected any funny business with your console you were susceptible to having your account suspended. 
As Microsoft streamlines their product lines and services, a compromised account can have far reaching consequences. 
You could find yourself suspended from not only games and saves but Windows and Office suite. 
And even if you imagine yourself as above phishing schemes or weak passwords, have fun walking your parents through it. 
As ownership of digital games and software licenses become tenuous at best, trending towards paying more and owning less, it’s important to know you can carry a grudge all the way to the judge. 
🕹️ Level up your inbox 
Don’t miss the latest reviews, news and tips. 
Sign up for our free newsletter. 
Phoebe Bridgers Launches Itch.io Page With An Infinite Runner 
Expensive Games Are Fueling Steam’s Most Lucrative Year Despite Players Trending Towards Older Releases 
Ubisoft Drops Claim That Monetization Makes Games ‘More Fun’ From Annual Report 
Brazilian Court Forces Xbox To Restore Hacked Account And Pay Damages As Players Grapple With An All-Digital Future 
Vanillaware Artist Moved Into The Mountains For Six Years To Create Lush Love Letter To Old School RPGs 
Warframe Dev Calls The Sudden Death Of Destiny 2 Horrible News And Says It’s Terrifying To Not Be In Charge Of Your Own ‘Goodbye’ 
Minecraft Adds The Ability To Sit 17 Years Later And It’s Reinventing Everything 
Christopher Nolan Says Young People Absolutely Hate AI: ‘In Filmmaking It’s Hitting At Exactly The Wrong Time’ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Zack Kotzer: 3.1%Kotaku: 4.4%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.2%Kotaku: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Zack Kotzer: 4.8%Kotaku: 4.0%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 7.3%Zack Kotzer: 1.8%Kotaku: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.5%Kotaku: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Zack Kotzer: 1.3%Kotaku: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias3.1%This article: 6.2%Zack Kotzer: 7.3%Kotaku: 5.8%Framing Effect6.2%This article: 9.1%Zack Kotzer: 0.6%Kotaku: 1.1%Loss Aversion9.1%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.8%Kotaku: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Zack Kotzer: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 1.5%Kotaku: 2.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Zack Kotzer: 3.6%Kotaku: 3.4%Pessimism Bias6.7%This article: 38.3%Zack Kotzer: 16.8%Kotaku: 13.5%Negativity Bias38.3%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.8%Kotaku: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Zack Kotzer: 1.1%Kotaku: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 3.0%Kotaku: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 1.3%Kotaku: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Zack Kotzer: 1.3%Kotaku: 3.6%Halo Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 1.3%Kotaku: 2.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Zack Kotzer: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Zack Kotzer: 3.2%Kotaku: 1.3%Ad Hominem3.4%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.6%Kotaku: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.6%Zack Kotzer: 3.4%Kotaku: 2.6%Appeal to Authority7.6%This article: 3.3%Zack Kotzer: 1.7%Kotaku: 2.3%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 9.1%Zack Kotzer: 1.8%Kotaku: 1.0%Slippery Slope9.1%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 29.4%Zack Kotzer: 8.9%Kotaku: 9.4%Hasty Generalization29.4%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.2%Zack Kotzer: 0.1%Kotaku: 1.1%Bandwagon4.2%This article: 29.0%Zack Kotzer: 8.2%Kotaku: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion29.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 1.1%Kotaku: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.3%Zack Kotzer: 2.4%Kotaku: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.3%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 1.3%Kotaku: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.3%Zack Kotzer: 2.0%Kotaku: 4.3%Anecdotal5.3%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.7%Zack Kotzer: 1.5%Kotaku: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.7%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.3%Zack Kotzer: 1.7%Kotaku: 2.8%Unattributed Quote12.3%This article: 4.4%Zack Kotzer: 1.5%Kotaku: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 26.9%Zack Kotzer: 21.0%Kotaku: 15.3%Biased Writer Voice26.9%This article: 3.6%Zack Kotzer: 3.1%Kotaku: 2.4%Indoctrination3.6%This article: 8.7%Zack Kotzer: 4.5%Kotaku: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Zack Kotzer: 0.7%Kotaku: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Zack Kotzer: 2.4%Kotaku: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

551 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers9.4%attributed speech499writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMicrosoft • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coveragePhoebe Bridgers • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageUbisoft • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageChristopher Nolan • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Christopher Nolan

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words33% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.7 ptsWriter: 29.7%Christopher Nolan: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-10.8 ptsWriter: 10.8%Christopher Nolan: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Christopher Nolan: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Christopher Nolan: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Christopher Nolan: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Christopher Nolan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.