Speaker summary
43% 16 analyzed articles/videos 913.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Nolan results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 175 hits . Analysis detected 1,637.475 faulty-reasoning hits from 913.333 analyzed words across 16 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,639 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Nolan is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Christopher Nolan
Speaker details
Total words: 913.333
Content count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score16 analyzed videos913.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CNN 0% 7/19/2026, 11:00:04 AM