Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These CNN results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 4,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,439 analyzed words across 2 videos, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This CNN is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,439
Video count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CNN 0% 7/19/2026, 4:00:04 AM
CNN 0% 7/4/2026, 6:00:01 AM