Author summary
58% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claire Lehmann results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 2,120 hits . Analysis detected 17,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,718 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,983 of 6,316 authors). This Claire Lehmann is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Claire Lehmann
Author details
Total words: 17,718
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.0% 12.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst