Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stock Markets results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 926 hits. Analysis detected 9,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,732 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,228 of 16,562 topics). This Stock Markets is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Stock Markets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,732
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos