Author summary
0% 23 analyzed articles/videos 1,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kazuaki Nagata results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,948 hits . Analysis detected 17,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,344 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,780 of 6,172 authors). This Kazuaki Nagata is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Kazuaki Nagata
Author details
Total words: 16,344
Article count: 23
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score23 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst