Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J.R. Duren results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 1,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ā 76% (1,566 of 6,361 authors). This J.R. Duren is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. J.R. Duren
Author details
Total words: 1,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst