Newsmax75%

Oil Climbs as Iran War Drags On; Stocks Set Records 45%

By STAN CHOE0%

5/11/2026, 3:39:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 968 faulty-reasoning hits from 762 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.3% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,246 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the article peer group.

Oil prices rose Monday as the war with Iran threatens to drag on for longer, but the U.S. stock market nevertheless inched toward more records. 
The price for a barrel of Brent crude oil climbed 2.9% to settle at $104.21 after President Donald Trump said the U.S.-Iran ceasefire was on "life support" after he rejected Iran's latest proposal to end their war. 
The rejection raises the stakes for Trump's trip this week to China, where he could urge President Xi Jinping to pressure Iran into making concessions. 
Xi has influence because China is the biggest buyer of Iran's sanctioned crude oil. 
The war has already sent the price for a barrel of Brent up from roughly $70 and delivered a blast of painful inflation through the global economy. 
That's because it has shut the Strait of Hormuz and kept oil tankers stuck in the Persian Gulf instead of delivering crude to customers worldwide. 
Still, the U.S. stock market has set a run of records on hopes that the war will not keep oil prices high for very long. 
Companies are meanwhile producing bigger profits than analysts expected, while signals suggest the U.S. economy is holding up even though households are feeling discouraged by expensive gasoline and tariffs. 
On Wall Street, the S&P 500 rose 0.2% from its prior all-time high set on Friday. 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 95 points, or 0.2%, and the Nasdaq composite added 0.1% to reach its own all-time high. 
The majority of stocks within the S&P 500 fell, even though the overall index rose. 
Among them was Mosaic, which reported much weaker results for the latest quarter than analysts expected. 
The fertilizer company is benefiting from higher prices for its products, but it's also contending with much higher prices for sulfur and other raw materials because of logistics snarls created by the war with Iran. 
Mosaic's stock fell 1.8%. 
Stocks of companies whose customers have the least cushion to absorb higher gasoline prices also struggled, and Dollar General fell 7.6%. 
Businesses with big fuel bills likewise had sharp losses, including drops of 4.3% for Royal Caribbean and 3.2% for Southwest Airlines. 
Helping to offset that was Fox, which climbed 7.6% after reporting stronger profit and revenue for the latest quarter than analysts expected. 
More than 4 out of every 5 companies in the S&P 500 that have reported their results for the latest quarter so far have topped profit expectations, and they're on track to deliver overall growth of nearly 28%, according to FactSet. 
If that turns out to be the case, it would be the best growth since the end of 2021. 
It's not just U.S. companies muscling past analysts' profit expectations. 
Globally, companies are on track for their strongest growth in more than four years, according to Deutsche Bank strategists led by Binky Chadha. 
The boom in artificial-intelligence technology has helped corporate profits rise at a faster rate than overall economies. 
Outside of earnings reports, Beazer Homes USA soared 34% after Dream Finders Homes offered to buy it in a deal valued at roughly $704 million. 
A combination would create the country's seventh-largest homebuilder, and Dream Finders is asking Beazer's shareholders to push its management and board to OK the deal after making several attempts itself. 
Dream Finders rose 5%. 
Tech stocks were also strong, continuing their big run amid the AI boom. 
Gains of 2% for Nvidia and 6.5% for Micron Technology were the strongest forces pushing the S&P 500 upward. 
All told, the S&P 500 rose 13.91 points to 7,412.84. 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 95.31 to 49,704.47, and the Nasdaq composite gained 27.05 to 26,274.13. 
In stock markets abroad, indexes were mixed across Europe and Asia. 
France's CAC 40 fell 0.7% for one of the world's bigger losses, while South Korea's Kospi soared 4.3% thanks to gains for Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and other tech stocks benefiting from AI. 
In the bond market, Treasury yields ticked higher. 
The 10-year yield rose to 4.40% from 4.38% late Friday. 
Yields had moderated a bit this month, but they remain well above where they were before the war with Iran began. 
Higher yields can raise rates for mortgages and other kinds of loans going to U.S. households and businesses, which in turn can slow the economy. 
Higher yields also tend to push downward on prices for stocks and other kinds of investments. 
A report on Monday said the pace of sales for previously occupied U.S. homes was weaker last month than economists expected. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.8%Stan Choe: 2.3%Newsmax: 3.4%Confirmation Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.6%Newsmax: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Stan Choe: 3.0%Newsmax: 3.2%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 5.5%Stan Choe: 1.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 2.5%Stan Choe: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.5%Hindsight Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 2.2%Newsmax: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 4.3%Newsmax: 11.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.3%Newsmax: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.4%Newsmax: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Stan Choe: 6.3%Newsmax: 4.1%Optimism Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 2.8%Newsmax: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Stan Choe: 5.9%Newsmax: 10.3%Negativity Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.3%Newsmax: 3.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Stan Choe: 0.5%Newsmax: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error4.6%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.3%Newsmax: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Stan Choe: 1.0%Newsmax: 2.0%Halo Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Stan Choe: 1.2%Newsmax: 1.9%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 1.3%Stan Choe: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.6%Newsmax: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.2%Stan Choe: 2.5%Newsmax: 4.8%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.7%Newsmax: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.3%Stan Choe: 0.4%Newsmax: 1.4%Slippery Slope3.3%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 2.6%Newsmax: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.7%Stan Choe: 0.6%Newsmax: 0.5%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.6%Newsmax: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 40.6%Stan Choe: 8.0%Newsmax: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)40.6%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.4%Newsmax: 0.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.6%Stan Choe: 1.7%Newsmax: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.6%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.0%Newsmax: 3.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.2%Newsmax: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.5%Stan Choe: 2.0%Newsmax: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice12.5%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.4%Newsmax: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%Newsmax: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

762 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.4%attributed speech698writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageFactSet • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDeutsche Bank • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

FactSet

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words64% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.6 ptsWriter: 13.6%FactSet: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.