Speaker summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FactSet results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 60.8% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 106 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,942 of 28,364 speakers). This FactSet is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
FactSet
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
35.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 60.8%60.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 60.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos