Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These MATT OTT AP business writer results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 468 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This MATT OTT AP business writer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
MATT OTT AP business writer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%MATT OTT AP business writer (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 564
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles564 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.1%13.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 15.1%15.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.5%7.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.5%5.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos