Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Curry results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,270 hits. Analysis detected 8,525 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,244 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,727 of 6,244 authors). This Benjamin Curry is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Benjamin Curry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
73%Benjamin Curry (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,244
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.3%15.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate