BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 713 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.5% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,322 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the article peer group.

NEW YORK (AP)  Wall Street held steadier Monday and recovered some of its sell-off from last week, as stocks swept up in the artificial-intelligence boom bounced back. 
Oil prices, meanwhile, rose following fighting between Israel and Iran, but they pared their biggest gains. 
The S&P 500 added 0.3%, coming off a drop of 2.6% from Friday that was its worst since October. 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped 80 points, or 0.2%, and the Nasdaq composite climbed 0.9%. 
Some of the best performers were companies that sell computer chips, memory and other products fueling the AI boom. 
They had plunged Friday amid worries that their prices had shot too high due to AI euphoria. 
Such worries dragged South Korea’s Kospi index down 8.3% early Monday, pummeling tech stocks there like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. 
But prices recovered as trading moved westward through Europe to New York. 
Micron Technology rose 9.9% after sliding 13.3% Friday for the largest loss in the S&P 500. 
That resumed a run where its stock has more than tripled so far in 2026. 
Marvell Technology climbed 9.6% in its first trading after S&P Dow Jones Indices said the semiconductor company’s stock has grown enough to join its widely followed S&P 500 index. 
Marvell’s stock has also more than tripled so far this year, aided by a 32.5% surge in one day last week. 
That was its best day since it began trading in 2000, and it came after Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, suggested at a conference in Taiwan that Marvell could be “the next trillion-dollar company.” 
Corning climbed 5.6% after Amazon announced a multibillion dollar deal where Corning will produce optical fiber, cable and other products for its data centers across the country. 
That helped offset a 0.9% dip for Campbell’s, which reported a stronger profit for the latest quarter than analysts expected but also a worse decline in revenue. 
The company’s stock is also set to drop out of the S&P 500 index when Marvell Technology’s stock joins it. 
All told, the S&P 500 rose 21.99 points to 7,405.73. 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped 80.77 to 50,786.01, and the Nasdaq composite gained 220.23 to 25,929.66. 
In the oil market, prices jumped after Israel and Iran launched strikes against each other, threatening to drag the region back into full-scale war. 
The price for a barrel of Brent crude oil, the international standard, briefly topped $98 overnight. 
But it later regressed after Israel and Iran appeared to back away from further strikes. 
Brent’s price settled at $94.25 per barrel, up 1.2% from Friday. 
High oil prices caused by the war with Iran have already sent inflation higher, which increases not only bills for households but also yields in the bond market. 
High yields worldwide recently have threatened to slow economies and undercut prices for stocks and all kinds of other investments. 
On Monday, Treasury yields ticked a bit higher following their jump on Friday. 
The yield on the 10-year Treasury edged up to 4.56% from 4.55%. 
In stock markets abroad, indexes edged lower Europe following sharp losses in Asia. 
Japan’s Nikkei 225 dropped 3.8%, while stocks fell 1.7% in Shanghai and 1.2% in Hong Kong. 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 2.3%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.6%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Stan Choe: 3.0%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.0%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 2.2%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Stan Choe: 4.3%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.9%Stan Choe: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 6.3%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Stan Choe: 2.8%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 11.4%Stan Choe: 5.9%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.3%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Stan Choe: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.3%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Stan Choe: 1.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.3%Stan Choe: 1.2%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.1%Stan Choe: 2.5%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority6.1%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.7%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.4%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Stan Choe: 2.6%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 1.6%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 34.2%Stan Choe: 8.0%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)34.2%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.4%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Stan Choe: 1.7%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.4%Stan Choe: 1.0%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote11.4%This article: 6.1%Stan Choe: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 9.0%Stan Choe: 2.0%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice9.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.2%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stan Choe: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

544 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech466writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMicron Technology • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageS&P Dow Jones Indices • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJensen Huang • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jensen Huang

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words42% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jensen Huang: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jensen Huang: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.5 ptsWriter: 10.5%Jensen Huang: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.