Keyword summary
50% 47 analyzed articles/videos 31,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 13,326 hits . Analysis detected 124,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 120,898 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (29,158 of 37,536 keywords). This Samsung is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Samsung
Keyword details
Total words: 120,898
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score47 analyzed articles120.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst