CNET47%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs. Z Fold 7: Improved Battery, Screen and a Higher Price 12%

By Prakhar Khanna54%

7/23/2026, 4:50:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anchoring Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 1,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.8% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,311 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the article peer group.

At Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event, the phone-maker announced three new folding phones, including its first-ever Ultra foldable phone. 
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the true successor of last year’s Fold 7, while the Fold 8 enters with an all-new wide-fold design. 
These devices are still priced high enough to put them out of reach for many, but they pack subtle design improvements that might make a big impact in daily life. 
I love the new anti-reflective coating, easier-to-unfold design and battery upgrades, but the Galaxy Z Fold 7 remains a powerful and capable device  especially if you can get it at a rare discount. 
The two book-style foldables differ mainly in experiential upgrades rather than spec bumps. 
It might be hard to get an idea of what’s exactly new. 
That’s why I put them side by side during my hands-on to find out. 
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is roughly the same size as the already thin-and-light Fold 7. 
It weighs the same but is a millimeter slimmer when unfolded. 
Both phones are comfortable to hold, but the new model is easier to open. 
Samsung has made the Ultra’s sides slightly slimmer so its bezels don’t run all the way to the corners. 
This gives you a slight gap between the sides to make it easier to unfold. 
In comparison, the Fold 7 has flat sides with zero gap when the phone is folded shut, making it more difficult to unfold. 
Both phones have a 6.5-inch AMOLED cover screen and an 8-inch AMOLED folding display with a 120Hz variable refresh rate. 
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra’s inner screen is brighter at 3,000 nits (versus 2,600 nits on the Fold 7). 
It also has a matte finish, along with my long-requested feature: an anti-reflective coating for better legibility in harsh lighting conditions and outdoors. 
I held both phones indoors in direct light, and the difference was noticeable. 
My Fold 7 was more susceptible to glare and harder to see under direct light when compared to the new model. 
The crease situation has also been improved. 
It is minimal and can’t be seen unless you're specifically looking for it. 
The phone-maker has added a new display structure that combines titanium-alloy film with an enhanced titanium plate to strengthen the display and balance the “hinge mechanics, display tension and magnetic force to make unfolding feel smoother, lighter and more natural,” says Samsung. 
Both foldables are IP48 rated for dust and water resistance. 
So, they aren’t truly dust-tight like the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Honor Magic V6, but they can survive being dunked in water for at least 30 minutes (the “8” in IP48). 
But they won’t protect against dust particles smaller than 1mm (the “4” in that rating). 
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy chip, as compared with the Fold 7’s Snapdragon 8 Elite processor. 
Both phones come in three storage variants: 256GB, 512GB and 1TB, with the top-end model getting 16GB of RAM (the 256GB and 512GB models are again paired with 12GB of RAM). 
Samsung says it has created more space in the internals for better heat dissipation, so you can theoretically expect better thermal management. 
As for the battery, this is the first time Samsung is using the silicon-carbon anode technology. 
It has allowed the phone-maker to upgrade the cell capacity from 4,400 mAh to 5,000 mAh on the new model. 
The Ultra also supports faster wired charging at 45 watts (the Fold 7 offered 25 watts). 
On paper, it is still behind Chinese rivals like Oppo and Honor, which include over 6,000-mAh batteries in their respective folding phones, but I’m hoping this spec bump will help me get through a day with ease. 
Both phones have Qi wireless charging, but no inbuilt magnets. 
You’ll have to buy a separate magnetic case to add compatibility with Qi2 wireless chargers and other magnetic accessories. 
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra’s camera array is mostly unchanged from last year’s model, with one exception: the ultrawide sensor. 
You get a 200-megapixel main camera and a 10-megapixel telephoto sensor with 3x optical zoom on both phones. 
However, the 12-megapixel ultrawide camera has been upgraded to a 50-megapixel sensor. 
You can expect higher-quality images, but I’ll wait for CNET’s tests to identify the real differences. 
Both foldables shoot video in 8K at 30 frames per second, but the Fold might appeal to more creatives. 
The new model adds support for the APV codec and adds a Cine LUT to give cinematic color and tone control directly from your phone. 
This adds greater flexibility for editing and production workflows for professional creators. 
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 launched with Android 16 onboard last year, and the Fold 8 Ultra is coming with Android 17 (with One UI 9 on top). 
You get a similar software experience on both phones, and the Z Fold 7 will get the update to Android 17 with One UI 9. 
The two devices support the full suite of Samsung’s Galaxy AI features alongside Gemini access. 
There’s AI Select for on-screen search support, an object eraser tool in the Gallery app and contextual AI features like Now Nudge for first-party apps. 
The latter displays contextual actions based on on-screen information. 
Like, if you're having a chat in the Messages app, and they send you an invite with the date, time and address, Samsung’s Now Nudge feature will show a pop-up to add it to Calendar. 
The phone-maker also demoed a new agentic AI feature at my demo, which wasn’t very impressive. 
Ideally, the new Gemini feature would help book a hotel just by looking at an on-screen photo of the Eiffel Tower, but in its current state, it was unreliable. 
But since the Z Fold 8 Ultra gets seven years of software updates and the Z Fold 7 has six more years to go, there’s plenty of time for both phones to continue to improve on these features. 
To see more differences between the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and the Z Fold 7, check out the specs chart below. 
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs. 
Z Fold 7: Specs and prices 
| | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 | 
|---|---|---| 
| Cover display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate | 6.5-inch AMOLED; 2,520×1,080 pixels; up to 120Hz variable refresh rate | 4.1-inch AMOLED; 1,048×948 pixels; 120Hz refresh rate | 
| Internal display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate | 8.0-inch AMOLED; 2,256×2,504 pixels; up to 120Hz variable refresh rate | 6.9-inch AMOLED; 2,520×1,080 pixels; 1 to 120Hz refresh rate | 
| Pixel density | Cover: 422 ppi; Internal: 422 ppi | Cover: 342ppi; Internal: 397ppi | 
| Dimensions (inches) | Open: 6.23 x 5.6 x 0.16 in; Closed: 6.23 x 2.87 x 0.35 in | Open: 2.96 x 6.56 x 0.26 in; Closed: 2.96 x 3.37 x 0.52 in | 
| Dimensions (millimeters) | Open: 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1mm; Closed: 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9mm | Open: 75.2 x 166.7 x 6.5mm; Closed: 75.2 x 85.5 x 13.7mm | 
| Weight (grams, ounces) | 215g (7.58 oz) | 188g (6.63 oz.) 
| 
| Mobile software | Android 17 with One UI 9 | Android 16 | 
| Cameras | 200-megapixel (wide), 50-megapixel (ultrawide), 10-megapixel (telephoto), 10-megapixel (cover screen selfie) | 50-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) | 
| Internal screen camera | 10-megapixel | 10-megapixel | 
| Video capture | 8K at 30 fps | 4K | 
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | Samsung Exynos 2500 | 
| RAM/storage | 12GB + 256GB; 12GB + 512GB; 16GB + 1TB | 12GB + 256GB, 12GB + 512GB | 
| Expandable storage | None | None | 
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 4,300 mAh | 
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Yes | 
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C | 
| Headphone jack | None | None | 
| Special features | IP48 rating, Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 (cover screen), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (Rear), Advanced Armor Aluminum, 5G (sub6, mmW), Wi-Fi 7, 3,000-nit peak brightness, anti-reflective display, 45-watt wired charging, 20-watt wireless charging | One UI 8, IP48 water resistance, 25W wired charging, Qi wireless charging, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, Galaxy AI | 
| US price starts at | $2,100 (256GB); $2,300 (512GB); $2,700 (1TB) | $1,100 (256GB) | 
| UK price starts at | £1,899 (256GB); £2,069 (512GB); £ 2,409 (1TB) | £1,049 | 
| Australia price starts at | AU$2,999 (256GB); AU$3,299 (512GB); AU$3,899 (1TB) | AU$1,799 | 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.3%Prakhar Khanna: 1.9%CNET: 1.7%Confirmation Bias2.3%This article: 6.8%Prakhar Khanna: 1.8%CNET: 2.3%Anchoring Bias6.8%This article: 1.8%Prakhar Khanna: 2.8%CNET: 2.9%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 3.0%Prakhar Khanna: 1.4%CNET: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 3.4%CNET: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 3.6%CNET: 4.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.6%CNET: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Prakhar Khanna: 0.9%CNET: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.4%CNET: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Prakhar Khanna: 7.4%CNET: 3.8%Optimism Bias8.5%This article: 2.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.6%CNET: 1.3%Pessimism Bias2.0%This article: 2.5%Prakhar Khanna: 1.8%CNET: 3.6%Negativity Bias2.5%This article: 3.9%Prakhar Khanna: 2.2%CNET: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.1%CNET: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.3%This article: 1.9%Prakhar Khanna: 5.4%CNET: 4.3%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 1.6%CNET: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.5%CNET: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Prakhar Khanna: 2.5%CNET: 4.2%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.9%CNET: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.5%CNET: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.8%Prakhar Khanna: 4.9%CNET: 4.7%Hasty Generalization0.8%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.4%CNET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 1.1%CNET: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 1.0%CNET: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.5%Prakhar Khanna: 2.1%CNET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.1%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.1%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.1%CNET: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.3%Prakhar Khanna: 7.3%CNET: 6.3%Anecdotal9.3%This article: 2.3%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.3%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 4.2%CNET: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.2%CNET: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Prakhar Khanna: 1.6%CNET: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.4%CNET: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.5%Prakhar Khanna: 7.9%CNET: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice7.5%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 5.0%CNET: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 0.0%CNET: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Prakhar Khanna: 6.6%CNET: 13.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1459 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.9%attributed speech1,417writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSamsung • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 58 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Samsung

100%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words100% of attributed speech42% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Samsung: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Samsung: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.