Speaker summary
53% 23 analyzed articles/videos 1,204.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 315.983 hits . Analysis detected 2,392.269 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,204.667 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,943 of 26,780 speakers). This Samsung is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Samsung
Speaker details
Total words: 1,204.667
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 5.5% BS Score23 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst