Author summary
44% 13 analyzed articles/videos 3,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariella Moon results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,409 hits . Analysis detected 11,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,620 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,723 of 6,628 authors). This Mariella Moon is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Mariella Moon
Author details
Total words: 14,620
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score13 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst