Engadget42%

TikTok is no longer banned on US government devices 74%

By Mariella Moon44%

7/18/2026, 9:29:15 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 329 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,685 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the article peer group.

The US Department of Justice has announced that federal employees can now download and install TikTok on electronics provided by the government, explaining that its current version doesn't pose the risks the previous one did. 
In 2022, TikTok was outlawed on almost all devices issues by the US federal government due to national security concerns. 
Chris Wray, the FBI director at the time, warned that China could use the app to collect data on users via its parent company ByteDance. 
In 2024, the US House of Representatives passed a bill that would ban TikTok in the country altogether unless ByteDance sells it. 
A deal for the app's business in the US was finalized in January this year, leading to the creation of a new entity called TikTok USDS Joint Venture. 
ByteDance retained an almost 20 percent stake in the new business, but the rest is controlled by a group of non-Chinese investors, including Oracle. 
When the deal was announced, TikTok said the new venture will protect American users' data with Oracle's secure US cloud environment. 
It also said that the US entity will train TikTok's algorithm on data from people in the US, while promising users that they will still get international content. 
In the Justice Department's announcement, it said: "The version of TikTok operated by the TikTok US Data Security Joint Venture does not fall within this prohibition because the Joint Venture functions independently of ByteDance, is majority-owned by American investors, and has revised the content recommendation algorithm and cybersecurity program originally developed by ByteDance to insulate federal government information against the concerning security features that initially motivated the prohibition." 
However, it's still up to individual agencies to decide whether or not to allow their employees to download TikTok on federal phones. 
"For instance, agencies may independently decide to ban the downloading of TikTok to government devices for workforce management reasons, such as promoting employee productivity," the DOJ wrote. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 35.9%Mariella Moon: 4.1%Engadget: 3.1%Confirmation Bias35.9%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 1.2%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 1.8%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.1%Mariella Moon: 0.9%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.1%This article: 8.5%Mariella Moon: 0.4%Engadget: 0.6%Hindsight Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 3.1%Engadget: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Mariella Moon: 7.7%Engadget: 6.0%Framing Effect17.3%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 1.4%Engadget: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 20.7%Mariella Moon: 1.3%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias20.7%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.9%Mariella Moon: 5.2%Engadget: 4.6%Optimism Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 1.4%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Mariella Moon: 4.8%Engadget: 7.0%Negativity Bias7.6%This article: 8.2%Mariella Moon: 2.3%Engadget: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.4%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Mariella Moon: 0.2%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias7.3%This article: 7.3%Mariella Moon: 0.3%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.3%This article: 7.3%Mariella Moon: 2.0%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.3%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.4%Engadget: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 37.7%Mariella Moon: 7.2%Engadget: 4.9%Appeal to Authority37.7%This article: 6.7%Mariella Moon: 0.9%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.6%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.2%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 3.2%Engadget: 5.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 8.2%Mariella Moon: 0.2%Engadget: 0.3%Red Herring8.2%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.3%Engadget: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Mariella Moon: 2.1%Engadget: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 20.7%Mariella Moon: 2.0%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question20.7%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 2.2%Engadget: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.6%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.4%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.1%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 1.4%Engadget: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 29.2%Mariella Moon: 2.9%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)29.2%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.3%Engadget: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.5%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.9%Mariella Moon: 3.8%Engadget: 2.9%Unattributed Quote28.9%This article: 20.7%Mariella Moon: 1.7%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection20.7%This article: 6.4%Mariella Moon: 1.9%Engadget: 7.5%Biased Writer Voice6.4%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.6%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariella Moon: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Mariella Moon: 9.6%Engadget: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.9%

329 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers69%attributed speech103writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageUS Department of Justice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageChris Wray • 25 words • 0.0% coverageUS House of Representatives • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTikTok • 21 words • 100.0% coverageTikTok • 28 words • 100.0% coverageUS Department of Justice • 68 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageUS Department of Justice • 27 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
130 attributed words58% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Unattributed Quote+73.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%US Department of Justice: 73.1%73.1%Quote-first Misdirection+52.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%US Department of Justice: 52.3%52.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.