Topic summary
49% 50 analyzed articles/videos 32,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 11,396 hits . Analysis detected 139,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 153,949 analyzed words across 50 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,454 of 16,560 topics). This Cybersecurity is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Cybersecurity
Topic details
Total words: 153,949
Article count: 50
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score50 analyzed articles153.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst