Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Devices results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 1,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,814 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Devices is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Federal Devices
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Federal Devices (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 987
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles987 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 34.5%34.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 34.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos