Author summary
54%6 analyzed articles/videos5,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prakhar Khanna results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,734 hits. Analysis detected 18,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,861 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,580 of 6,358 authors). This Prakhar Khanna is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Prakhar Khanna
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Prakhar Khanna (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,861
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate