Author summary
31% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke James results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,514 hits . Analysis detected 16,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,049 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,704 of 6,277 authors). This Luke James is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Luke James
Author details
Total words: 23,049
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles23K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst