Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridget Carey results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Anchoring Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 182 hits . Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 762 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 88% (813 of 6,506 authors). This Bridget Carey is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Bridget Carey
Author details
Total words: 762
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.5% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles762 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 23.9% 23.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.1% 17.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.8% 6.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst