Keyword summary
44% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Markets results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,157 hits . Analysis detected 17,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,792 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (26,413 of 34,426 keywords). This Financial Markets is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Financial Markets
Keyword details
Total words: 20,792
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst