Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Ott results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 835 hits . Analysis detected 7,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,638 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,066 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Ott is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Matt Ott
Author details
Total words: 6,638
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst