Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yuri Kageyama results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,149 of 6,282 authors). This Yuri Kageyama is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Yuri Kageyama
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Yuri Kageyama (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.7%11.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos