BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Slippery Slope, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 1,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 592 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,507 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the article peer group.

Trading on Wall Street was subdued and oil prices retreated modestly as Israel and the United States carried out a wave of attacks that killed 25 people in Iran on Monday ahead of U.S. 
President Donald Trump’s deadline for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. 
Futures for the S&P 500 ticked up 0.1%, while futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.2%. 
Nasdaq futures gained 0.3%. 
Iran’s South Pars natural gas field was among the targets hit Monday. 
Iran responded with missile fire on Israel and its Gulf Arab neighbors while mediators circulated a new ceasefire proposal. 
Among those killed in one of the attacks on Tehran was the head of intelligence for Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Maj. 
Gen. 
Majid Khademi, according to Iranian state media and Israel’s defense minister. 
Trump, whose deadline expires Monday night Washington time, said that if no deal was reached to reopen the strait, the U.S. would hit Iran’s power plants and other infrastructure targets and send the country “back to the stone ages.” 
“Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran,” he threatened in a social media post on Easter Sunday, adding that if Iran did not open the strait “you’ll be living in Hell.” 
In an effort to stop the fighting, Egyptian, Pakistani and Turkish mediators have sent Iran and the U.S. a proposal calling for a 45-day ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to give time to try and find a way to end the war, two Mideast officials have told The Associated Press. 
Iran and the U.S. have not responded to the proposal, sent late Sunday night to both Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. 
Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff, the officials said. 
Despite the new attacks, threats and Trump’s looming deadline, oil prices fell early Monday. 
Benchmark U.S. crude dropped $1.40 to $110.14 a barrel. 
Brent crude, the international standard, lost 45 cents to $108.58 a barrel. 
Energy markets were closed Friday, but prices have been surging for weeks on fears that the Iran war will drag on longer than expected. 
U.S. crude is up more than 60% since the war started five weeks ago, while Brent is up close to 50%. 
Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 finished 0.6% higher at 53,413.68. 
South Korea’s Kospi gained 1.4% to 5,450.33. 
Trading was closed in Australia for Easter; in Hong Kong and Shanghai for a traditional Chinese holiday, and in France, Germany and Britain in observance of Easter. 
The U.S. relies on the Persian Gulf for only a fraction of the oil it imports, but oil is a commodity and prices are set in a global market. 
Some nations, like resource-poor Japan, import a large portion of their energy needs and rely heavily on access to the Strait of Hormuz. 
Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told lawmakers recently that Japan was releasing its reserves and was working on alternative routes. 
South Korea’s trade ministry said it plans to send at least five ships to Saudi Arabi in the coming weeks to establish new oil transport routes in the Red Sea. 
“As we kick off the first full trading week of April, the word uncertainty is paramount. 
Last year it was centered on the impact of ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs, this year it’s uncertainty surrounding the ongoing Iranian War,” said Jay Woods, analyst at Freedom Capital Markets in New York. 
Yuri Kageyama is on Threads: https://www.threads.com/@yurikageyama 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.4%Yuri Kageyama: 1.4%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Yuri Kageyama: 4.5%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.0%This article: 4.9%Yuri Kageyama: 1.2%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 1.7%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Yuri Kageyama: 7.6%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%Yuri Kageyama: 4.3%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias17.4%This article: 18.4%Yuri Kageyama: 7.9%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias18.4%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Yuri Kageyama: 1.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Yuri Kageyama: 5.5%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.8%Yuri Kageyama: 3.0%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority11.8%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 5.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 13.3%Yuri Kageyama: 5.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope13.3%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Yuri Kageyama: 1.0%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.3%Yuri Kageyama: 11.7%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.2%Yuri Kageyama: 3.0%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.2%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.3%Yuri Kageyama: 2.6%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.3%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.0%Yuri Kageyama: 3.3%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote13.0%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.8%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice3.0%This article: 6.8%Yuri Kageyama: 1.7%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination6.8%This article: 0.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Yuri Kageyama: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.9%This article: 1.0%Yuri Kageyama: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

592 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers27%attributed speech431writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSanae Takaichi • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSouth Korea’s trade ministry • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJay Woods • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
79 attributed words49% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+50.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 50.6%50.6%Unattributed Quote-17.9 ptsWriter: 17.9%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.