BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 226 hits. Analysis detected 1,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 872 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,774 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the article peer group.

NEW YORK (AP)  America’s first billionaire president may soon be profiting from a new line of business tied to his office: charging access for a first peek at certain posts on his Truth Social platform. 
Donald Trump’s struggling media company plans to sell Wall Street traders the chance to see posts from “highest-ranking” accounts  including possibly his own  milliseconds before others. 
That could mean big money for them, and Trump. 
Trump’s posts are often important enough to rattle financial markets, sending prices soaring and plunging within seconds. 
Until this moment, presidential policy announcements were considered sort of public property that should be free and available to all at the same time. 
The president has the most followers on Truth Social  12.9 million  so presumably will be included in the mix of high-ranking accounts. 
Truth Social’s public parent, Trump Media & Technology, did not respond to emailed questions, including whether Trump’s posts will be excluded from the offering, but the planned service is attracting plenty of attention  and not just from traders. 
“It’s odious, selling access to highest bidders on Wall Street,” said Dylan Hedler-Gaudette, an expert on federal ethic rules at watchdog Project on Government Oversight. 
“Everything he says has market implications.” 
How the new business hopes to make money 
Called Truth PSI, the service announced in a short press release Thursday would allow Wall Street trading firms and institutions to see certain posts earlier than other users so they could profit off subsequent moves in stocks, bonds and interest rates. 
The Trump Media release did not give any sense of the size of the new business but quotes CEO Kevin McGurn as saying he expects it to become a “meaningful” source of revenue as part of a strategy to “monetize proprietary assets.” 
The company added that it expects to launch the service next month. 
His posts are often important enough to rattle financial markets, sending prices soaring and plunging within seconds. 
Until this moment, presidential policy announcements were considered sort of public property that should be free and available to all at the same time. 
The customers that Truth Social is targeting are high frequency traders who jump ahead of others in reacting to news to buy and sell bonds and other financial instruments. 
And a few thousands of a second often spells the difference between profits and losses. 
The law doesn’t bar Trump from doing this 
The service is similar to others at rival social media firms but with a key difference: It’s the president posting. 
But there appears to be nothing to stop Trump from doing this, at least legally. 
Conflict of interest laws would bar U.S. government officials from owning a company that profits off their office by selling access to their decisions through public posts, says Washington University’s Clark. 
But the president and vice president, she notes, are excluded from the provision. 
Despite that, all presidents since the law was passed decades ago have acted as if it applied  selling individual stocks, dumping business holdings or putting their financial assets in a blind trust so they wouldn’t know what was being bought and sold on their behalf while they wielded power  but Trump has refused. 
No response from the White House, or his businesses 
The White House referred questions, including those about the president profiting off its office, to the company that owns Truth Social. 
Several messages sent to that company, Trump Media & Technology, have not been returned. 
And Trump’s own family company, the Trump Organization, declined to comment. 
Trump himself has repeatedly denied that there any conflicts between his obligation to act in the public interest and the opportunity to make money off the presidency. 
The White House has previously said Trump only does what is good for the country and is not involved in his family business. 
His Iran war posts are must reading for oil traders, too 
Trump has announced major decisions and musings about other topics, including staff changes, immigration crackdowns, and matters of war and peace in Ukraine and Iran. 
“IT’S LIBERATION DAY IN AMERICA,” he posted on June 24 last year about a short-lived Iran deal, sending oil prices plunging instantly. 
Stocks soared 9.5% that day, adding $4 trillion to investor wealth as measured by the S&P 500 index. 
“It’s yet more brazen corruption,” said Kathleen Clark of Washington University School of Law and an expert in government ethics rules. 
“Trump can line his pockets by selling access.” 
Trump Media needs the help 
The new service is the latest in a series of moves to try to revive the fortunes of Trump Media whose stock has plunged more than 70% since the president took office last year 
The company has been diversifying into various businesses  crypto, financial services and nuclear fusion  but all to no avail. 
It recently replaced its longtime CEO, former Congressman Devin Nunes, with McGurn  but the stock kept sinking anyway. 
The stock rose 0.6% on the news Thursday, and up by half that amount the next day at $9.66. 
Before Trump took office last year, it closed at $40. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.9%Bernard Condon: 1.5%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.9%This article: 3.9%Bernard Condon: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 6.0%Bernard Condon: 3.1%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 6.1%Bernard Condon: 1.4%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic6.1%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 1.3%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Bernard Condon: 0.2%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.7%This article: 4.1%Bernard Condon: 18.9%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 13.5%Bernard Condon: 2.3%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias13.5%This article: 3.9%Bernard Condon: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 1.2%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Bernard Condon: 2.1%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 25.9%Bernard Condon: 19.9%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias25.9%This article: 2.6%Bernard Condon: 1.5%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias2.6%This article: 1.3%Bernard Condon: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error1.3%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Bernard Condon: 0.8%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Bernard Condon: 5.7%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 3.2%Bernard Condon: 0.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.2%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.4%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.2%Bernard Condon: 7.1%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization18.2%This article: 4.5%Bernard Condon: 1.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring4.5%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.8%Bernard Condon: 5.5%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 1.2%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.3%Bernard Condon: 5.9%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.3%This article: 3.1%Bernard Condon: 0.4%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque3.1%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.5%Bernard Condon: 0.9%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.8%Bernard Condon: 2.9%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.8%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.3%Bernard Condon: 0.9%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading6.3%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.3%Bernard Condon: 1.2%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote5.3%This article: 5.3%Bernard Condon: 3.9%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection5.3%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 6.3%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.3%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bernard Condon: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Bernard Condon: 4.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.6%

872 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers12%attributed speech768writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDylan Hedler-Gaudette • 25 words • 100.0% coverageDylan Hedler-Gaudette • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWashington University’s Clark • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWashington University’s Clark • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 21 words • 100.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dylan Hedler-Gaudette

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words30% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Unattributed Quote+80.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dylan Hedler-Gaudette: 80.6%80.6%Quote-first Misdirection+80.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dylan Hedler-Gaudette: 80.6%80.6%Attempt to Sell a Product +75.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Dylan Hedler-Gaudette: 80.6%80.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.