Topic summary
⁠31%5 analyzed articles/videos1,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conflicts Of Interest results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,323 hits. Analysis detected 7,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,513 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,022 of 15,772 topics). This Conflicts Of Interest is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Conflicts Of Interest
Topic details
Total words: 9,513
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos