Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al Shaw results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 2,072 hits . Analysis detected 8,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,346 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,651 of 6,244 authors). This Al Shaw is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Al Shaw
Author details
Total words: 14,346
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst