Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos9,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Bowlin results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 5,604 hits. Analysis detected 32,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,922 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,716 of 6,628 authors). This Nick Bowlin is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Nick Bowlin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
14%Nick Bowlin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 41,922
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

14% percentile
025507510013.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles41.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.4%13.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate