Author summary
80% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyatte Grantham-Philips results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 3,660 hits . Analysis detected 29,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,101 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,426 of 6,628 authors). This Wyatte Grantham-Philips is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Wyatte Grantham-Philips
Author details
Total words: 25,101
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst